sponsored by psychohistorian.org

DOCdb

Deep Sky Observer's Companion – the online database

 

Welcome, guest!

If you've already registered, please log in,

or register an observer profile for added functionality.

List:

log in to manage your observing lists

 browse:

 

 position:

 

 next:

 

 options:

summary

rename

prune

trim

remove

close

copy

combine

plan

bookmark

load

new

delete

marathon

favourite!

Full database:

Entire DOCdb database of 18,816 objects.

 browse:

 position:

NGC 6938 (16,317 of 18,816)

 next:

oc gc pln bn dn gx gxcl ast aka lost

Object:

list

bookmark

finder chart

altitude today

altitude (year)

 search:

½°, , in DOCdb


Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /home/yivumoo/public_html/show_object.php on line 167

show browsing

NGC 6938

NGC 6938, VIII 17, h 2082, GC 4589

RA: 20h 34m 42s
Dec: +22° 12′ 54″

Con: Vulpecula
Ch: MSA:1193, U2:164, SA:9

Ref: DAML02, Corwin (2004)

(reference key)

Type: star cluster?

Mag: B=?, V=?

Size: 7′
PA: ?

History and Accurate Positions for the NGC/IC Objects (Corwin 2004)

NGC 6938 is probably the scattered group of stars about a minute of time following WH's single position from 18 July 1784. There is a small core about 5 arcmin by 3 arcmin at the eastern end of a larger elongated grouping 18 arcmin by 8 arcmin -- both of these are clearly seen on the red POSS1, and both are elongated in the same position angle (about 105-110 degrees). On the blue POSS1, the small core is southeast of the center of a poorly-defined, nearly circular grouping of stars about 20 arcmin across.

Even though JH saw the cluster (if that is what it is) twice, he was clearly not impressed. His first observation has no RA and only an approximate Dec. His description reads, "Very poor. The large star taken but carelessly, as it offers no interest." He did better the second time with a well-determined RA, but still only an approximate Dec, 3 arcmin south of his first estimate. He also misidentifies the cluster as "VII. 17" rather than "VIII. 17" as it properly is.

Historical observations

William Herschel (c.1784)

Synonyms: H VIII-017

Discovered in 1785 by William Herschel with an 18.7-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He called it "a cluster of many large scattered stars."

Published comments

Sulentic & Tifft (1973)

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NOCL S.

Favourite lists

Lacaille's catalogue

The Messier objects

Dunlop's catalogue

The Bennett objects

The Caldwell list

Named DSOs

Object search

First search phrase

    and

Second search phrase

Type of object to include:

open cluster
globular cluster
planetary nebula
bright nebula
dark nebula
galaxy
galaxy cluster
asterism & stars
unverified/lost
nova

The Bug Report

DOCdb is still in beta-release.

Known issues, feature requests, and updates on bug fixes, are here:

> Bug Report

Feedback

Found a bug? Have a comment or suggestion to improve DOCdb? Please let us know!

> Contact us

Help!

DOCdb is a free online resource that exists to promote deep sky observing.

You could help by sharing your observations, writing an article, digitizing and proof-reading historical material, and more.

> Find out more

Everything on DOCdb.net is © 2004-2010 by Auke Slotegraaf, unless stated otherwise or if you can prove you have divine permission to use it. Before using material published here, please consult the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Some material on DOCdb is copyright the individual authors. If in doubt, don't reproduce. And that goes for having children, too. Please note that the recommended browser for DOCdb is Firefox 3.x. You may also get good results with K-Meleon. Good luck if you're using IE. A successful experience with other browsers, including Opera and Safari, may vary.