sponsored by psychohistorian.org
RA: 19h 27m 15s
Dec: −71° 34′ 55″
Ch: MSA:1530, U2:456, SA:26
Ref: [1755MmARS..??..194L ], Cozens PhD 2008
Type: stars (two)
Mag: B=?, V=?
Lacaille I.13 is taken to be the two stars HD 181464 (SAO 257686; V=8.3, 19h 26m 44.66s, -71°27'57.9") and HD 181354 (SAO 257685; V=8.0, 19h 26m 19.90s, -71°27'57.4").
Wolfgang Steinicke (Historic NGC 2009) lists it as two stars, and Glen Cozens (2008) lists it as an asterism, "2 stars 8th to 9th magnitude".
NGC 6777 may be NGC 6752 (first suggested by Owen Gingerich in a Sky and Telescope article which appeared in the February 1960 issue on page 207). If so, there is a large error in Lacaille's position.
Much closer to his position is a fairly close pair of 9th magnitude stars, SAO 257685 and 257686. These were mentioned by Delisle Stewart in his Harvard Annals 60 list, and were subsequently picked up by Andris Lauberts for ESO-B. Would these two stars look like "the nucleus of a small comet" in the eyepiece of Lacaille's half-inch aperture quadrant? Perhaps. But I like Gingerich's idea a bit better.
Lacaille's J2000.0 position is 19h 27m 15s –71° 34' 55".
His description reads: "It resembles the preceding" i.e. "It resembles a small nucleus of a faint comet."
Dunlop 69 is recorded as "(43 Pavonis, Bode's Catalogue.) I cannot find the nebula answering to this place: perhaps there may be a mistake in the right ascension."
NGC 6777: Table IV: Not seen, 2 * nr magn 8 or 9, but no neb.
The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a galaxy.
The Messier objects
The Bennett objects
The Caldwell list
DOCdb is still in beta-release.
Known issues, feature requests, and updates on bug fixes, are here:
Found a bug? Have a comment or suggestion to improve DOCdb? Please let us know!
DOCdb is a free online resource that exists to promote deep sky observing.
You could help by sharing your observations, writing an article, digitizing and proof-reading historical material, and more.
Everything on DOCdb.net is © 2004-2010 by Auke Slotegraaf, unless stated otherwise or if you can prove you have divine permission to use it. Before using material published here, please consult the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Some material on DOCdb is copyright the individual authors. If in doubt, don't reproduce. And that goes for having children, too. Please note that the recommended browser for DOCdb is Firefox 3.x. You may also get good results with K-Meleon. Good luck if you're using IE. A successful experience with other browsers, including Opera and Safari, may vary.