sponsored by psychohistorian.org


Deep Sky Observer's Companion – the online database


Welcome, guest!

If you've already registered, please log in,

or register an observer profile for added functionality.


log in to manage your observing lists























Full database:

Entire DOCdb database of 18,816 objects.



NGC 6647 (15,184 of 18,816)


oc gc pln bn dn gx gxcl ast aka lost




finder chart

altitude today

altitude (year)


½°, , in DOCdb

Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /home/yivumoo/public_html/show_object.php on line 167

show browsing

NGC 6647

NGC 6647, C 1828-173, VIII 14, h 2014, GC 4418

RA: 18h 31m 30s
Dec: −17° 21′ 0″

Con: Sagittarius
Ch: MSA:1367, U2:340, SA:16


(reference key)

Type: open cluster

Mag: B=?, V=8

Size: ?
PA: ?

History and Accurate Positions for the NGC/IC Objects (Corwin 2004)

NGC 6647, H VIII 14, was also seen by JH whose position is adopted in NGC. There is nothing obvious at that position. WH's original position is about 8 arcmin west-northwest of his son's. Just 4 arcmin northeast of that is a group, about four arcmin across, of a couple of dozen stars. The brightest is around 12th magnitude. I think that these are the stars that WH took to be a cluster.

What I find curious about this object is the description. NGC follows GC exactly in calling the object a "Cl, L, Ri, lC, sts vS." How did JH get that out of his father's and his own observations? WH's description reads, "A cl of sc pL sts," while JH's reads "A very loose parcel of v small stars, hardly noticeable as a cluster." "Large" perhaps, but "Rich"? Perhaps JH penned the description in haste.

Whatever the case, the clump of stars that I believe to be WH's object does not match the NGC description, though it does fit what WH himself wrote.

Historical observations

William Herschel (c.1784)

Synonyms: H VIII-014

Discovered in 1785 by William Herschel with an 18.7-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He called it "a cluster of scattered pretty large stars."

Published comments

Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B. (1925/1926)

Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B. "Integral magnitudes of south star clusters", Astron. Nach. 228, 325. Comparing the brightness of the cluster with the extrafocal images of stars, he estimates the magnitudes as 7.94

Melotte, P.J. (1915)

A catalogue of star clusters shown on Franklin-Adams chart plates. Mem.R.A.S., 60(5), 175-186.

An open cluster of fairly bright stars. Resembles NGC 6494. Not in NGC; noted by Bailey. Possibly this is NGC 6647.

Sulentic & Tifft (1973)

(Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NO CL DC.

Favourite lists

Lacaille's catalogue

The Messier objects

Dunlop's catalogue

The Bennett objects

The Caldwell list

Named DSOs

Object search

First search phrase


Second search phrase

Type of object to include:

open cluster
globular cluster
planetary nebula
bright nebula
dark nebula
galaxy cluster
asterism & stars

The Bug Report

DOCdb is still in beta-release.

Known issues, feature requests, and updates on bug fixes, are here:

> Bug Report


Found a bug? Have a comment or suggestion to improve DOCdb? Please let us know!

> Contact us


DOCdb is a free online resource that exists to promote deep sky observing.

You could help by sharing your observations, writing an article, digitizing and proof-reading historical material, and more.

> Find out more

Everything on DOCdb.net is © 2004-2010 by Auke Slotegraaf, unless stated otherwise or if you can prove you have divine permission to use it. Before using material published here, please consult the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Some material on DOCdb is copyright the individual authors. If in doubt, don't reproduce. And that goes for having children, too. Please note that the recommended browser for DOCdb is Firefox 3.x. You may also get good results with K-Meleon. Good luck if you're using IE. A successful experience with other browsers, including Opera and Safari, may vary.