sponsored by psychohistorian.org

DOCdb

Deep Sky Observer's Companion – the online database

 

Welcome, guest!

If you've already registered, please log in,

or register an observer profile for added functionality.

List:

log in to manage your observing lists

 browse:

 

 position:

 

 next:

 

 options:

summary

rename

prune

trim

remove

close

copy

combine

plan

bookmark

load

new

delete

marathon

favourite!

Full database:

Entire DOCdb database of 18,816 objects.

 browse:

 position:

NGC 40 (143 of 18,816)

 next:

oc gc pln bn dn gx gxcl ast aka lost

Object:

list

bookmark

finder chart

altitude today

altitude (year)

 search:

½°, , in DOCdb


Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /home/yivumoo/public_html/show_object.php on line 167

show browsing

NGC 40

NGC 40, HD 826, HIP 1041, PK 120+09 1, PN VV' 3, PN VV 1, PN G120.0+09.8, Caldwell 2, IV 58, h 8, GC 20

RA: 00h 13m 1.0149s
Dec: +72° 31′ 19.085″

Con: Cepheus
Ch: MSA:24, U2:3, SA:1

Ref: SIMBAD

(reference key)

Type: planetary nebula

Mag: B=11.7, V=11.4

Size: ?
PA: ?

Historical observations

William Herschel (c.1784)

Synonyms: H IV-058

Discovered in 1787 by William Herschel with an 18.7-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He called it "a star 9th mag, surrounded with vF milky nebulosity. The star is either double, or not round. Less than 1' diameter."

Published comments

Marling, J.B. (1986)

Marling, J.B. (1986) In pursuit of planetaries. Sky&Telescope, Jun, 631.

Photo index

Photo index by Jim Lucyk: Sky&Tel. 5/70 p310, Sky&Tel. 6/86 p631, Sky&Tel. 7/82 p19, Sky&Tel. 9/78 p200, Sky&Tel. 2/88 p151, Sky&Tel. 10/69 p227 (sketch), Astronomy mag. 2/83 p77, Astronomy mag. 9/85 p90, Deep Sky Monthly 1/81 p12.

Sulentic & Tifft (1973)

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a 10.0 mag planetary nebula.

Modern observations

Tom Lorenzin

Tom Lorenzin, in the electronic version of "1000+ The Amateur Astronomers' Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing", notes the magnitude as 12.4 and comments: "44" diameter; oblong with 11.5M central star; 13M star 2' to S."

Walter Scott Houston

Houston notes that this is a 10th mag planetary about 0.6' in diameter. Though located in a region devoid of bright guide stars, it was spied with his 5-inch Moonwatch scope.

Ancient City Astron.Club (1980)

Listed by the Herschel Club, described as "easy to observe, situated near two field stars. Round, bright nucleus fading a little to the outside of disk, greenish in colour. 8-inch, 43x."

Kaler, James B

James B. Kaler ("The Amateur Scientist", Scientific American, May 1992) notes: "Larry Mitchell and Phil Kuebler searched for NGC 40 with a 10-inch. They found the nebula easily and saw a slightly elongated halo and a prominent central star. With his 24-inch scope Mike Dennis could distinguish a hint if a greenish cast."

[amastro] recent PN observations

Rich,

Stephen O'Meara first introduced me to the odd NE projection of NGC 40 a few years back at TSP, sort'a as an observing challenge. At the time, however, not even he was 100% sure of the correct size/orientation of the feature. So without knowing what to expect, I tried but didn't even suspect any odd "arm" protruding from the bright nebula with Mira. The very next TSP, on the other hand, I came armed with images galore, and I set out to see this mysterious object. I tried once again in the 16, but still couldn't quite convince myself of a positive observation. I then tried with a buddy's 25-incher, with which a couple of us suspected a row of 3 or 4 extremely faint stellarings at the correct position of the brighter segment of the "arm".

The entire feature does have somewhat of a "knotty" structure, however, I am still uncertain that what we saw was actually nebulous in nature and not just a couple of very faint, unresolved stars as were obvious elsewhere within the same field. The power used was about 661x, and no filter seemed to assist in the identification of the knots. Do let me know of any positive ID of the projection that you may make with the 24-incher though, because this thing definitely "looks" observable when compared to other nebulosity in the deep images. But we all know how that goes...

One of these days, I may be able to afford a scanner and possibly make some of these recent drawings available. The ones associated with this recent microstructure study are pretty damn intense, if ya' know what I mean... Because they are each being drawn at the highest useable powers and under only the best of conditions available to me at present. The project is taking forever to complete, however, the results have been quite phenomenal. It should make for truly kick-butt article--that is, if I can manage to squeeze more than one observation (and drawing) within a couple of pages ;-) HOWEVER, if Gary could possibly convince S&T to dedicate one entire issue to the observation of PNe (like Deep Sky #15 back in '86), the possibilities are quite endless ;-)

--That was a joke, guys... Everyone should be laughing at this point...

Jay McNeil

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brian Skiff

POSS: neb in pa13. m13 * 1' SW. m9-10 *s 3'.3 SSW, 3'.8 NE.

PK: photo has S up, W left.

15cm - consp @ 80x w/m9.5 * NE. 140x/195x: circ, 30" diam, reaching 1/3 or 3/8 way to m12.5 * SW. cen * vis @ 80x w/o difficulty, m10.5-11. *ings nr E, NW, & SSW edges. NE quad of neb wk; sl brtness variations over sfc throughout. DS filter good. UHC fair but not a great help; [OIII] seems to dim neb significantly. BS, 10Dec1990, Anderson Mesa.

25cm - seen @ 47x, quite br @ 180x. cen * consp. 1' diam, round. on SE is flashing spot vis w/averted vis. m13 * 1' NW. smooth w/one or two dk spots. dk immed around *; neb rises in brtness in the middle of the annulus.

30cm - 576x: 1'.2 NE of m13 *. unevenly br. cen * m11.5. brtning located in pa120 from cen *. elong E-W, 55"x40".

Contemporary observations

Tom Bryant

2009 12 29 19:44:13

Observing site: Little Tycho Observatory

Telescope: C-8

[0h 13m 0s, 72 32m 0s] A 12mv star surrounded by a very faint 5" nebulous cloud. A real challange in urban skies. Mismarked on the finder chart.

2009 12 27 20:19:10

Observing site: Little Tycho Observatory

Telescope: C-8

[0h 13m 0s, 72 32m 0s] Even with a finder chart, tough to find, stellar. I could see no nebulosity, just a 11mv star. There was an 7.5mv SAO star 1 degree north of it that was undetected and had no Tycho or Hipparcos counterparts.

Favourite lists

Lacaille's catalogue

The Messier objects

Dunlop's catalogue

The Bennett objects

The Caldwell list

Named DSOs

Object search

First search phrase

    and

Second search phrase

Type of object to include:

open cluster
globular cluster
planetary nebula
bright nebula
dark nebula
galaxy
galaxy cluster
asterism & stars
unverified/lost
nova

The Bug Report

DOCdb is still in beta-release.

Known issues, feature requests, and updates on bug fixes, are here:

> Bug Report

Feedback

Found a bug? Have a comment or suggestion to improve DOCdb? Please let us know!

> Contact us

Help!

DOCdb is a free online resource that exists to promote deep sky observing.

You could help by sharing your observations, writing an article, digitizing and proof-reading historical material, and more.

> Find out more

Everything on DOCdb.net is © 2004-2010 by Auke Slotegraaf, unless stated otherwise or if you can prove you have divine permission to use it. Before using material published here, please consult the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Some material on DOCdb is copyright the individual authors. If in doubt, don't reproduce. And that goes for having children, too. Please note that the recommended browser for DOCdb is Firefox 3.x. You may also get good results with K-Meleon. Good luck if you're using IE. A successful experience with other browsers, including Opera and Safari, may vary.