sponsored by psychohistorian.org
RA: 05h 46m 32s
Dec: +00° 07′ 56″
Ch: MSA:253, U2:226, SA:11
Type: reflection nebula
Mag: B=?, V=?
NGC 2067 is a part of the large complex of nebulae around M78 = N2068. Found by Tempel, neither the position nor the description makes it really clear which part of the nebula he saw. The first position I give in the main table is for a large patch of pretty low surface brightness nebulosity about 5 arcmin northwest of M78. But this is not the brightest nebulosity in the area. That is a knot about 3 arcmin southwest, the brightest part of a long faint streamer pointed toward NGC 2064. This, however, is much more east than north of M78, while Tempel says that M78 is to the south.
So, a bit of a mystery here -- which part of the nebulosity was Tempel refering to? I've stuck with the larger more northerly end of the nebula, but could well be wrong, so have also put the southern knot in the main table.
Ced 55t (NGC 2067)
Position (1900): RA 5 41.4, Dec + 0 4
Star: 0 1177 (Mp=10.8, V=10.3, SpT=B8)
Spectrum of nebula: continuous spectrum (inferred from sp.t. of illuminating star)
Classification: Neb associated with mainly one star (which may be multiple) - Nebula with bright rim (eg. IC 434)
Notes: "Ced 55 t = NGC 2067 = GC 5356. Disc. Tempel 1878 (746). WP 166. (114, 216, 238 409 Pl 14, 578, 630 Pl 34). R. This is the curious nebula (somewhat resembling a hand-saw) situated north-west of M 78. +0 1177 = HD 38563. Ced 55: The Orion region. History and bibliography: (118, 119, 186, 188, 191, 276, 352). The nebulous groundwork and the exterior nebulosities: (20, 21, 26, 53, 58, 78, 142, 143, 186, 191, 206, 207, 278, 279, 281, 282, 289, 305, 312, 438, 480, 519, 540. 541, 593, 594, 595, 620, 625, 628, 630 Pl 34, 663, 675, 715, 726 No 41, 769, 782, 802, 818). R. It is shown on several photographs, e.g. (630) Pl 34, that the whole region of the constellation Orion is filled up by vast masses of nebulosity. As is well known, there are several condensation which seem to stand out from the general background, and which have been separately discovered and studied. Such subnebulae, will be individually discussed below. Taken as a whole, No 55 of the catalogue should be classified as C. 2 in addition to the separate classes of the subnebulae."
= NGC 2067, Ced 55t
Pos (1950.0) 05:44.0, +0:06
Size: 8x3 (blue), 7x3 (red).
The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a diffuse nebula.
Bernes, C. (1977) A catalogue of bright nebulosities in opaque dust clouds.
Bernes 102 = NGC 2064 / NGC 2067 / NGC 2068, M78
= DG 79, [RK68] 41, Bernes 102, N2067, Ced 55t
Class: C (reflection neb)
Steve Coe (Glendale, Arizona, USA) observing with a 17.5-inch f/4.5, writes in The Webb Society Nebulae and Clusters Section Report No. 10, July 1992: "These two nebulae [NGC 2064-2067] are near M78 [NGC 2068] and I could not distinguish what I saw. There is a very dim, elongated nebula at the location with two stars involved at x100."
Steve Coe, using a 13" f/5.6, notes: " Faint, pretty small, round, not brighter in the middle at 220X. Both NGC 2064 and 2067 are near M 78 on the western side."
The Messier objects
The Bennett objects
The Caldwell list
DOCdb is still in beta-release.
Known issues, feature requests, and updates on bug fixes, are here:
Found a bug? Have a comment or suggestion to improve DOCdb? Please let us know!
DOCdb is a free online resource that exists to promote deep sky observing.
You could help by sharing your observations, writing an article, digitizing and proof-reading historical material, and more.
Everything on DOCdb.net is © 2004-2010 by Auke Slotegraaf, unless stated otherwise or if you can prove you have divine permission to use it. Before using material published here, please consult the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Some material on DOCdb is copyright the individual authors. If in doubt, don't reproduce. And that goes for having children, too. Please note that the recommended browser for DOCdb is Firefox 3.x. You may also get good results with K-Meleon. Good luck if you're using IE. A successful experience with other browsers, including Opera and Safari, may vary.