sponsored by psychohistorian.org

DOCdb

Deep Sky Observer's Companion – the online database

 

Welcome, guest!

If you've already registered, please log in,

or register an observer profile for added functionality.

List:

log in to manage your observing lists

 browse:

 

 position:

 

 next:

 

 options:

summary

rename

prune

trim

remove

close

copy

combine

plan

bookmark

load

new

delete

marathon

favourite!

Full database:

Entire DOCdb database of 18,816 objects.

 browse:

 position:

NGC 1436 (2,624 of 18,816)

 next:

oc gc pln bn dn gx gxcl ast aka lost

Object:

list

bookmark

finder chart

altitude today

altitude (year)

 search:

½°, , in DOCdb


Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /home/yivumoo/public_html/show_object.php on line 167

show browsing

NGC 1436

NGC 1436, NGC 1437, AGC 22906, ESO 358-58, ESO 358-57, LEDA 13687, MCG-06-09-025, SGC 034144-3600.6, h 2581, GC 769

RA: 03h 43m 36.9s
Dec: −35° 51′ 15″

Con: Eridanus
Ch: MSA:400, U2:356, SA:18

Ref: SIMBAD, Corwin (2004)

(reference key)

Type: galaxy, Sc

Mag: B=12.32, V=?

Size: 2.754′ x 1.548′
PA: 119°

Historical observations

John Herschel

On 22 October 1835 Herschel wrote: "globular cluster, very bright, and evidently a globular cluster. Observed past meridian, clouds having prevented its place being secured at the time of transit." Then, on 9 January 1836 he wrote: "bright, pretty much elongated, pretty gradually brighter to the middle. The place is taken from Mr Dunlop's Catalogue, but I have reason to believe this RA too great and the NPD also materially in error - perhaps 126 35' [Dunlop had 126 45'] would be preferable. It was found by sweeping past the meridian."

Published comments

Hinks, A.R. (1911)

Hinks, A. R. (1911) On the galactic distribution of gaseous nebulae and of star clusters. MNRAS, 71(8), 693-701.

List 6: "NGC numbers of clusters classed as globular, not in Bailey's catalogue"

Bailey, S.I. A catalogue of bright clusters and nebulae. Ann.Harv.Coll.Obs., 60(8), 199.

Helwan Obs. Bulletin No 15 (1915)

Nothing here. NGC 1427 answers fairly well to the descrioption and there are several other similar objects not far away."

Knox Shaw, H. (1915)

Knox Shaw, H. (1915) Note on the nebulae and star clusters shown on the Franklin-Adams plates. M.N.R.A.S., 76(2), 105-107.

Comments on papers by Harding (MNRAS, 74(8)), and Melotte (MemRAS 60(5)) describing objects foundon the Franklin-Adams plates; compares with plates taken with the Reynolds reflector (Helwan Obs Bull. 9-15):

Amongst the objects classed as globular clusters in the NGC, and not identified by Mr Melotte, NGC 1436 does not exist.

Doig, P. (1925)

Doig, P. (1925) Notes on the nebulae and clusters in Webb's 'Celestial Objects for Common Telescopes' (Sixth edition, Vol.ii). Part V. M.N.R.A.S., 36(3), 89.

Charlier, C.V.L. (1931)

Charlier, C V L (1931) "Stellar clusters and related celestial phaenomena", Lund Annals 2, 14, No. 19. Charlier examined prints from the Franklink-Adams atlas; "Table 6 gives a list of those objects in Bailey's catalogue for which the globular character is uncertain or not probable..."

NGC 1436 Remarks: "not found by Bailey."

Sulentic & Tifft (1973)

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NF DC.

Paturel et al. (1991)

Paturel, G., Petit, C., Kogoshvili, N. et al. (1991) An extragalactic data base. IV. Errors and misprints in catalogues of galaxies. Astrophys.J.Suppl.Ser., 91(3), 371.

NGC 1436 = NGC 1437

NGC 1436 = ESO 358-58

Remarks

The NGC 2000 calls it a galaxy, giving the position for 2000.0 asRA 3h 43m 35s Dec -35 50', but gives no other information, such as size or magnitude. The RNGC marks it as nonexistant, saying that Carlsen (1940) could not find it. It is not shown on the Uranometria 2000.0 charts.

Contemporary observations

Tom Bryant

2010 11 5 2:55:36

Observing site: Fall Star Party

Telescope: C-11

[3h 43m 36s, -35 52' 0"] A very faint smudge, barely visible, even in tonight's clear skies. AKA 1436. An NGC error.

2010 11 5 2:56:24

Observing site: Fall Star Party

Telescope: C-11

[3h 43m 36s, -35 51' 0"] A faint smudge. B:SBa.

Favourite lists

Lacaille's catalogue

The Messier objects

Dunlop's catalogue

The Bennett objects

The Caldwell list

Named DSOs

Object search

First search phrase

    and

Second search phrase

Type of object to include:

open cluster
globular cluster
planetary nebula
bright nebula
dark nebula
galaxy
galaxy cluster
asterism & stars
unverified/lost
nova

The Bug Report

DOCdb is still in beta-release.

Known issues, feature requests, and updates on bug fixes, are here:

> Bug Report

Feedback

Found a bug? Have a comment or suggestion to improve DOCdb? Please let us know!

> Contact us

Help!

DOCdb is a free online resource that exists to promote deep sky observing.

You could help by sharing your observations, writing an article, digitizing and proof-reading historical material, and more.

> Find out more

Everything on DOCdb.net is © 2004-2010 by Auke Slotegraaf, unless stated otherwise or if you can prove you have divine permission to use it. Before using material published here, please consult the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. Some material on DOCdb is copyright the individual authors. If in doubt, don't reproduce. And that goes for having children, too. Please note that the recommended browser for DOCdb is Firefox 3.x. You may also get good results with K-Meleon. Good luck if you're using IE. A successful experience with other browsers, including Opera and Safari, may vary.